We build for the work your practice actually repeats

What we built

We work with a Los Angeles partition practice. They had built the firm around co-ownership disputes, and the number every case turned on was the accounting: each owner’s contributions, mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, improvements, rents collected, offsets. It was assembled by hand from years of statements. They had hired accountants just to keep up.

A partition accounting engine. Statements and records in, a reconciled contribution and offset ledger out, every figure traceable to the document it came from. Alongside it, a chain of title builder that turns recorded instruments into a dated chronology with gaps flagged.

The accounting now starts as a draft instead of a blank page, and it is built from public recorded documents, so nothing confidential has to leave the firm to produce it.

What we built

We work with a consumer bankruptcy firm filing on flat fees. Their fee was fixed per case, so every hour spent on data entry came straight out of margin. The partner was a certified specialist doing work that did not require the certification, usually at night.

A schedules and SOFA builder. The debtor’s financial documents go in; draft schedules, the SOFA and a completed means test come out with every figure sourced back to the page it was read from. Plus a creditor matrix assembler and an amendment cascade, so a single changed fact propagates to every schedule it touches instead of orphaning one.

The mechanical half of a petition assembles itself. The judgment calls, which are the part the client is actually paying for, stay with the attorney.

What we built

We work with a family law firm handling business owner and executive divorces. Their cases turned on characterization, not paperwork: Moore/Marsden apportionment on a residence bought before the marriage, separate property traced through commingled accounts, equity grants that vested partly before and partly during. But the partner was spending his week on the disclosure package instead of the tracing.

A disclosure builder that captures the client’s facts once and renders them across FL-150, FL-142 and the supporting schedules, cross-checking for inconsistencies before service. On top of it, a tracing engine that runs statements, deeds and returns into a community versus separate analysis with the Moore/Marsden math shown.

The disclosures stop being a week of work, and the tracing, which is where the money actually is, gets the attention it deserves.

What we built

We work with a plaintiff-side firm running wage and hour class matters. The damages model was not a supporting exhibit for them, it was the case value and the certification argument at the same time. It also had to be defensible enough to survive an expert on the other side, and it was being built in spreadsheets.

A damages engine that reads timekeeping and payroll exports and produces an itemized, sourced number under the current Labor Code and applicable Wage Order. Beside it, a variance analysis that measures commonality across employees, which is the analysis certification actually turns on.

They know what a case is worth early enough for it to inform whether they take it, and the number holds up when it is challenged.

What we built

We work with a firm that advances all of its own case costs. Because they fronted every expense regardless of outcome, outside record review was their money at risk on cases that might never resolve. The demand was also going out late, and a demand that lands months after treatment ends settles for less.

A medical chronology builder: provider records in, a dated treatment timeline out with causation, treatment gaps and total billed surfaced. Then a demand assembler that pulls the chronology, bills, wage loss and liability facts into a complete package ready for review.

Record review moved from an at-risk per-page expense to something the firm owns, and demands go out in weeks instead of months.

What we built

We work with an applicant-side firm carrying a full comp caseload. Applicant fees are a court-approved percentage of the award, so they could not raise prices and could not bill more hours. The only lever was accuracy and volume, and when the defense rating came back low the disagreement was almost always in the arithmetic rather than the medicine.

A rating engine that reads the med-legal report and returns the full rating string with apportionment applied, plus an auditor that checks the defense rating against it and shows exactly where the two diverge.

Ratings get checked exhaustively instead of selectively, and a correctly rated case is worth more to the client and to the firm at the same time.

What we built

We work with a firm filing family and employment petitions at volume. They advertised a very high approval rate, which meant their real product was that nothing went out inconsistent. That checking was the expensive part, and it was happening at the end of a long day.

A package builder that captures the client’s facts once and renders them across every form in the filing, then checks the whole package for cross-form consistency before anything is signed. RFEs come back through the same system: the challenged criteria are identified and a response is drafted against the evidence already in the file.

Consistency stopped depending on who was proofreading, and an RFE stopped meaning unpaid rework on a flat fee.

What we built

We work with a defense firm running a broad general practice. Body-cam had quietly become the largest workload in the office and nobody had offered them anything for it. Separately, they had turned expungement and Prop 47 relief into a standalone service, which meant reading a rap sheet against four different statutes every time.

A discovery reviewer that ingests footage and reports and returns a timestamped index with every place the video and the written report disagree flagged. And a record clearing engine: a criminal history in, eligible relief determined across PC 1203.4, Prop 47, Prop 64 and AB 1076, petitions generated.

The footage gets watched completely rather than sampled, and record relief became a product they can actually scale instead of a favor that ate an afternoon.

What we built

We work with an estate planning practice selling packaged plans. They sold plans at a fixed price that included the home transfer, so margin depended entirely on how little manual work went into funding each one. They also knew the funding problem better than anyone, because they were being paid to fix other lawyers’ unfunded trusts.

A funding tracker. An asset list goes in; out comes what must be retitled, drafted deeds, beneficiary designations flagged, and a funding status the client can actually be shown. Alongside it, a restatement cascade so one change carries through the trust, the pour-over will, the powers of attorney, the directives and the deeds without leaving anything contradicting anything else.

Funding stopped being the step that quietly gets skipped, and a fixed-price plan stopped losing money on the back end.

What we built

We work with a litigation boutique that staffs large matters with contract attorneys. They deliberately did not carry associates, so surge capacity arrived at full rate and had to be brought up to speed on the record every time. The document layer of that surge did not need a lawyer at all.

An agreement comparison engine that reads a set of related documents and surfaces every provision that conflicts, with both sources cited. Plus a discovery reviewer that turns a production into an issue-tagged chronology of who knew what and when.

A new attorney joining a matter starts from a built record rather than a banker’s box, and the contradictions surface in hours rather than at deposition.